The Police Policy of applying firm action, often in the form of “shoot-on-sight,” against hardcore recidivists who endanger the public is always a heated issue in Indonesia. The goal is to protect society from the threat of repeated crimes and provide a deterrent effect. However, the implementation of this policy is constantly challenged by a crucial dilemma concerning the respect for Human Rights (HR).
The application of this action is generally based on the principle of self-defense and community protection. When criminals, especially recidivists, resist officers or threaten the lives of others, Police Policy permits the use of lethal force. The pretext is operational discretion to prevent a greater crime.
On the other hand, strong criticism arises from human rights activists who view the “shoot-on-sight” policy as potentially violating the right to life. The basic principle of criminal law dictates that every person is entitled to a fair trial, even if they are a recidivist. Therefore, the use of force must be proportional and a last resort, not the first.
A deep analysis of this Police Policy is necessary. International standards require law enforcement officials to adhere to the principle of caution in the use of firearms. Shots should be aimed at incapacitating, not extinguishing life, unless the lives of officers or others are in imminent and unavoidable danger.
A major challenge in implementing this policy is transparency and accountability. Every shooting incident must be thoroughly and openly investigated to ensure there is no abuse of authority. Without accountability, there is a fear that this Police Policy will be misused and damage public trust in the law enforcement institution.
The government and the Police must find common ground between firm law enforcement and respect for human rights. Enhancing professional training for Police members on the proportional use of force is crucial. The goal is to reduce recidivism rates without sacrificing fundamental humanitarian principles.
Instead of prioritizing extreme repressive actions, crime prevention should be emphasized more. This includes improving the correctional system so that recidivists are truly rehabilitated and do not repeat crimes. This strategy offers a more humane and effective long-term solution for public safety.